Prosecutors have introduced inner Bithumb paperwork as new proof of their case towards the change’s former CEO, Lee Sang-joon. The paperwork, dated Could 10, 2021, have been submitted to a South Korean courtroom the place Lee is going through costs associated to cryptocurrency listings on the platform.
The filings recommend that Lee, alongside former Bithumb Korea CEO Heo Baek-young and the previous chairman of Bithumb’s token itemizing evaluation committee, might have been concerned in choices concerning the itemizing of Dogecoin (DOGE) and Klaytn (KLAY).
Although the doc creator’s identification stays confidential, Heo claimed the committee’s former chairman might have written it.
Lee Denies Accusations, however Paperwork Forged Doubt
Lee has since denied the accusations, stating he lacked the authority to make itemizing choices. Nevertheless, the paperwork solid doubt on his claims, indicating he might have performed a job within the itemizing course of.
The investigation into Lee started in March 2023 when South Korean authorities probed bribery allegations associated to token listings on Bithumb. Lee was indicted with out detention in September 2023.
Earlier this 12 months, the Seoul Excessive Court docket acquitted Lee in a multimillion-dollar fraud case. The courtroom dominated that he was not responsible of defrauding Kim Byung-gun of 110 billion Received ($82 million) throughout acquisition negotiations. This adopted an earlier acquittal on comparable costs, together with allegations of searching for an upfront price for a failed BXA token itemizing on Bithumb.
In the meantime, Bithumb’s de facto proprietor, Kang Jong-hyun, can be going through a separate trial. Together with two different executives, Kang faces costs of embezzlement, fraudulent transactions, and breach of obligation. Experiences point out the accused have admitted to the costs.
Learn additionally: Bithumb CEO Investigated for Bribe in Trade for False Listings
Kang’s sister, Kang Ji-yeon, a significant shareholder in Bithumb-affiliated firms, has additionally been accused of inventory worth manipulation. In a now-deleted assertion, she defended her brother, dismissing the costs as “unconfirmed and one-sided.”
Disclaimer: The knowledge introduced on this article is for informational and academic functions solely. The article doesn’t represent monetary recommendation or recommendation of any form. Coin Version isn’t answerable for any losses incurred because of the utilization of content material, merchandise, or providers talked about. Readers are suggested to train warning earlier than taking any motion associated to the corporate.